PLEASE NOTE: To protect your safety in response to the threats of Covid-19, we are offering our clients the ability to meet with us in-person, via telephone, or through video conferencing. Please call our office to discuss your options.

Tampa 813-345-4909 | En Español 813-390-2494
Orlando / Miami / West Palm Beach - 888-496-5916

Work with experienced attorney in contesting federal civil asset forfeiture

In our previous post, we began speaking about the issue of civil asset forfeiture, which sometimes can come up alongside criminal cases. Civil asset forfeiture proceedings are separate from the criminal process, but because significant assets can be involved, it is important for criminal defendants to be aware of their rights in the forfeiture process.

First and foremost, property owners who have had cash or property seized as a result of a police investigation should know that they have the ability to challenge the validity of the seizure in court. The process for doing so is not exactly the same at the state and federal level. At the federal level, civil forfeiture actions can be initiated either in court, administratively, or in what is known as summary forfeiture, which typically involves contraband.  

Administrative forfeitures can be initiated by a seizing agency on most property valued at or below $500,000, although there is no limit for monetary instruments. Administrative forfeiture actions can be contested within a certain amount of time after they are initiated by filing a claim of ownership. Filing such a claim will result in the government ending the administrative forfeiture action and initiating a judicial forfeiture action in federal court.

At the federal level, the burden of proof is upon the government to show that the property in question was somehow involved in criminal activity. According to the FBI, probable cause in a forfeiture action means having a reasonable basis for belief of guilt which is more than a mere suspicion but less than sufficient evidence to support a finding of guilt. What exactly does this mean, though?

In our next post, we’ll continue speaking about the issue of burden of proof and why it is important for property owners to work with an experienced attorney to build a strong case.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Mark J. O'Brien's cases have been featured in:
The New York Times | The Miami Herald | Bay News 9 | abc 7 | The Boston Globe | USA Today | Tampa Bay Times | FOX News Channel | The Washington Post | abc Good Morning America | Chicago Tribune | NT News Talk Florida | St. Petersburg Times | Deadspin
“Mark, thank you for everything. I will forever be indebted to you. You have stood by me and believed in me when it was not the popular thing to do. You are an amazing advocate.” Adam Filthaut
  • Former Partner at the Law Firm of Adams and Diaco (Robert Adams and Stephen Diaco)
  • MJ (Todd Schnitt) Morning Show/Bubba the Love Sponge Clem Trial
  • Attorney Phil Campbell DUI Setup/Florida Bar Trial
More Testimonials
American Association for Justice National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers | NACDL 1958 Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers | FACDL Super Lawyers AVVO | See Reviews LC | Lead Counsel Rated
Best Criminal
Defense Lawyers
in Orlando