FEDERAL AND STATE CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS
O'Brien Hatfield, PA GET YOUR FREE CASE REVIEW GET YOUR FREE CASE REVIEW
TAMPA (813) 228-6989 • ORLANDO (407) 808-6750 • en Español (813) 390-2494

High Court to Decide If Intent Required in Bank Fraud Convictions

The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to resolve a split among the federal appellate circuits about whether a defendant can be convicted of bank fraud even when he never intended to defraud a bank and no bank stood any chance of being harmed. Should any financial scam be considered federal bank fraud if the money would be processed through a bank?

It may surprise you to learn that three federal appellate courts say yes. Six others, however, have ruled that a conviction for bank fraud should, at the very least, either be aimed at a financial institution or threaten some tangible harm. The 11th Circuit, which includes Florida, hasn't ruled on the question, according to the defendant's Supreme Court petition.

According to court filings in the case, a Utah man and a friend stole outgoing checks from people's mailboxes. They then presented six checks, crudely altered, to a local Target store in payment for their own food and merchandise purchases. In some cases, the man returned merchandise for cash refunds. In addition to six counts of bank fraud, he was convicted in 2011 of two counts of aggravated identity theft and one count of possessing stolen mail. He was sentenced to three years in federal prison.

Even the prosecution's own witness admitted that Target, not the banks, was liable for any losses from the bad checks. The defendant insists he never even thought to defraud a bank, and the parties agree that no bank was at any financial risk. Without either intent or harm, how could $ 1,184.58 in bad checks result in a federal bank fraud conviction?

The 10th Circuit, which includes Utah, upheld his conviction. Based on the statutory language of the federal bank fraud law, 18 U.S.C. §1344, the 10th Circuit had ruled in prior cases that intent was not an element of the crime.

"We recognize that our interpretation ... may cast a wide net for bank fraud liability, but it is dictated by the plain language of the statute and our prior precedent," the court wrote. Absent intervention by the Supreme Court, it said, its hands were tied.

The case is scheduled for argument in March, and the defendant will likely be released from prison before the Supreme Court issues its ruling. Potential bank fraud defendants in the 11th Circuit, however, could well benefit from a favorable ruling.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Mark J. O'Brien's cases have been featured in:
The New York Times | The Miami Herald | Bay News 9 | abc 7 | The Boston Globe | USA Today | Tampa Bay Times | FOX News Channel | The Washington Post | abc Good Morning America | Chicago Tribune | NT News Talk Florida | St. Petersburg Times | Deadspin
“Mark, thank you for everything. I will forever be indebted to you. You have stood by me and believed in me when it was not the popular thing to do. You are an amazing advocate.” Adam Filthaut
  • Former Partner at the Law Firm of Adams and Diaco (Robert Adams and Stephen Diaco)
  • MJ (Todd Schnitt) Morning Show/Bubba the Love Sponge Clem Trial
  • Attorney Phil Campbell DUI Setup/Florida Bar Trial
More Testimonials
American Association for Justice National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers | NACDL 1958 Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers | FACDL Super Lawyers AVVO | See Reviews LC | Lead Counsel Rated g+ | See Reviews