Tampa 813-345-4909 | En Español 813-390-2494
Orlando / Miami / West Palm Beach - 888-496-5916

Concerning the burden, standard of proof in criminal cases

In any criminal case, it is up to the government to provide evidence supporting each and every element of every charge. Most people have heard the term "burden of proof" and know that, in criminal cases, prosecutors must present relevant, reliable evidence proving the truth of the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. The latter is referred to as the standard of proof.

The standard of proof is different in criminal cases than it is in civil cases. A recent tax case involving Texas businessman Sam Wyly demonstrates the difference. Wyly was accused of engaging in deceptive and fraudulent actions-particularly using offshore trusts-over a number of years to avoid over $1 billion in tax obligations. 

The court handling Wyly's case recently found that there was "clear and convincing evidence" that Mr. Wyly committed tax fraud. That term, clear and convincing evidence, is a civil standard of proof higher than the ordinary preponderance standard. A preponderance standard requires the party seeking to prove the allegations to present evidence that the allegations are more likely than not true. By contrast, clear and convincing evidence requires a significantly greater degree of certainty of the truth of the allegations.

Both of these civil standards are, of course, different than the beyond a reasonable doubt standard used in criminal cases. The criminal standard of proof requires that the government show that there are no reasonable doubts regarding the truth of the allegations. What exactly constitutes "reasonable doubt" is a matter of discretion, and is a matter for the judge or the jury to decide. It depends on the strength of the evidence.

For criminal defendants in any case, working with an experienced criminal defense attorney ensures that prosecutors are held to their full burden of proof and that any reasonable doubts concerning the charges are brought to the fore in the case. Regardless of the facts of the case or the nature of the charges, having an experienced advocate ensures a criminal defendant can effectively defend him- or herself.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Mark J. O'Brien's cases have been featured in:
The New York Times | The Miami Herald | Bay News 9 | abc 7 | The Boston Globe | USA Today | Tampa Bay Times | FOX News Channel | The Washington Post | abc Good Morning America | Chicago Tribune | NT News Talk Florida | St. Petersburg Times | Deadspin
“Mark, thank you for everything. I will forever be indebted to you. You have stood by me and believed in me when it was not the popular thing to do. You are an amazing advocate.” Adam Filthaut
  • Former Partner at the Law Firm of Adams and Diaco (Robert Adams and Stephen Diaco)
  • MJ (Todd Schnitt) Morning Show/Bubba the Love Sponge Clem Trial
  • Attorney Phil Campbell DUI Setup/Florida Bar Trial
More Testimonials
American Association for Justice National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers | NACDL 1958 Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers | FACDL Super Lawyers AVVO | See Reviews LC | Lead Counsel Rated
Best Criminal
Defense Lawyers
in Orlando