PLEASE NOTE: To protect your safety in response to the threats of Covid-19, we are offering our clients the ability to meet with us in-person, via telephone, or through video conferencing. Please call our office to discuss your options.

Tampa 813-345-4909 | En Español 813-390-2494
Orlando / Miami / West Palm Beach - 888-496-5916

Federal sentencing guidelines and downward departures, P.2

In our previous post, we began looking at the issue of departures from federal sentencing guidelines. Departures, as we noted, can be either downward or upward depending on the circumstances. Downward departures, to be sure, present an opportunity for advocacy in criminal defense, but obtaining them is not a free-for-all. There are guidelines regarding when a departure may be appropriate, and prosecutors often ask for upward departures when they are able to do so. Here we’ll take a brief look at the issue.

Before we talk about departures, though, we want to briefly discuss the factors that go into coming up with a sentencing range under the guidelines. Understanding these factors will help explain how judges may arrive at a different sentencing result, and how criminal defense attorneys advocate for offenders in the sentencing phase. 

The basic scheme is fairly easy to understand: sentencing ranges are based on the seriousness of the offense and the offender’s criminal history. The guidelines work on a system which recognizes 43 levels of offense seriousness, with the higher numbers represented more serious crimes. Different categories of crime are assigned a base offense level which serves as a starting point for determining the seriousness of the offense in each case. Along with the base offense level, specific offense characteristics are considered, which are the factors unique to each particular case.

Fraud, for example, has an assigned base offense level of 6 or 7, depending on the specific statute under which the conviction was obtained. That base offense level can be increased by up to 30 points, though, depending on the amount of economic loss caused by the offense. The number of victims affected by the offense can also increase the seriousness of the offense by 2 to 6 points. Other factors that can contribute to the seriousness of the offense include: fraud against a government health care program; risk of death or serious bodily harm; and unauthorized transfer or use of identification information.

In our next post, we’ll continue with this topic, speaking specifically about what factors could justifiably lead to both upward and downward departure in fraud cases.

Source: U.S. Sentencing Commission, “An Overview of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines,” Accessed Jan. 16, 2015.

U.S. Sentencing Commission, “Analysis of Fraud Offenses,” Accessed Jan. 16, 2015.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Mark J. O'Brien's cases have been featured in:
The New York Times | The Miami Herald | Bay News 9 | abc 7 | The Boston Globe | USA Today | Tampa Bay Times | FOX News Channel | The Washington Post | abc Good Morning America | Chicago Tribune | NT News Talk Florida | St. Petersburg Times | Deadspin
“Mark, thank you for everything. I will forever be indebted to you. You have stood by me and believed in me when it was not the popular thing to do. You are an amazing advocate.” Adam Filthaut
  • Former Partner at the Law Firm of Adams and Diaco (Robert Adams and Stephen Diaco)
  • MJ (Todd Schnitt) Morning Show/Bubba the Love Sponge Clem Trial
  • Attorney Phil Campbell DUI Setup/Florida Bar Trial
More Testimonials
American Association for Justice National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers | NACDL 1958 Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers | FACDL Super Lawyers AVVO | See Reviews LC | Lead Counsel Rated
Best Criminal
Defense Lawyers
in Orlando