Federal sentencing guidelines and downward departures, P.2

In our previous post, we began looking at the issue of departures from federal sentencing guidelines. Departures, as we noted, can be either downward or upward depending on the circumstances. Downward departures, to be sure, present an opportunity for advocacy in criminal defense, but obtaining them is not a free-for-all. There are guidelines regarding when a departure may be appropriate, and prosecutors often ask for upward departures when they are able to do so. Here we’ll take a brief look at the issue.

Before we talk about departures, though, we want to briefly discuss the factors that go into coming up with a sentencing range under the guidelines. Understanding these factors will help explain how judges may arrive at a different sentencing result, and how criminal defense attorneys advocate for offenders in the sentencing phase. 

The basic scheme is fairly easy to understand: sentencing ranges are based on the seriousness of the offense and the offender’s criminal history. The guidelines work on a system which recognizes 43 levels of offense seriousness, with the higher numbers represented more serious crimes. Different categories of crime are assigned a base offense level which serves as a starting point for determining the seriousness of the offense in each case. Along with the base offense level, specific offense characteristics are considered, which are the factors unique to each particular case.

Fraud, for example, has an assigned base offense level of 6 or 7, depending on the specific statute under which the conviction was obtained. That base offense level can be increased by up to 30 points, though, depending on the amount of economic loss caused by the offense. The number of victims affected by the offense can also increase the seriousness of the offense by 2 to 6 points. Other factors that can contribute to the seriousness of the offense include: fraud against a government health care program; risk of death or serious bodily harm; and unauthorized transfer or use of identification information.

In our next post, we’ll continue with this topic, speaking specifically about what factors could justifiably lead to both upward and downward departure in fraud cases.

Source: U.S. Sentencing Commission, “An Overview of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines,” Accessed Jan. 16, 2015.

U.S. Sentencing Commission, “Analysis of Fraud Offenses,” Accessed Jan. 16, 2015.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • Badge 1
  • Badge 2
  • Badge 3
  • Badge 4
  • Badge 5
  • Badge 6
  • Badge 7
  • Badge 8

Contact O'Brien Hatfield, PA for a free case evaluation today

In Tampa, call (813) 345-4909. In Orlando, call (888) 496-5916 . For fast answers, email us using the form below.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

This site uses Google's Invisible reCAPTCHA, which is subject to Google's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Footer Brand

Tampa Bay Office
511 West Bay Street Suite 330
Tampa, FL 33606

Toll Free: 888-496-5916
Phone: 813-345-4909
Tampa Law Office Map

Central Florida Office
121 South Orange Avenue Suite 1500
Orlando, FL 32801

Toll Free: 888-496-5916
Phone: 407-686-1696
Orlando Law Office Map

South Florida Office
Northbridge Tower
515 North Flagler Drive
Suite P-300
West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Toll Free: 888-496-5916
Phone: 407-686-1696
South Florida Office Map

South Florida Office
Brickell Bay Office Tower
1001 Brickell Bay Drive
Suite 2700 M-1
Miami, FL 33131

Toll Free: 888-496-5916
Phone: 305-859-0046
Miami Law Office Map