PLEASE NOTE: To protect your safety in response to the threats of Covid-19, we are offering our clients the ability to meet with us in-person, via telephone, or through video conferencing. Please call our office to discuss your options.

Tampa 813-345-4909 | En Español 813-390-2494
Orlando / Miami / West Palm Beach - 888-496-5916

Florida high court rules police must have warrant to track suspect’s cell phone location

When police conduct criminal investigations, they cannot do whatever they want. Police are bound by rules which aim to protect the rights of those suspected of criminal activity. One of these important rights is that of privacy. Among the rules intended to protect suspect’s right to privacy is the well-known warrant requirement.

Unless there is some exceptional situation, police are bound to obtain a warrant before conducting a search. This includes searches of cell phones. Earlier this summer, the Supreme Court ruled that police must obtain a warrant before looking at a criminal suspect’s cell phone data. Earlier this month, the Florida Supreme Court took that ruling a step further and decided that police may not keep tabs on a suspect through cell phone signals without a warrant. 

The case which gave rise to the ruling involved an individual whose position was tracked by police and who was ultimately arrested on drug possession charges. The court ruled that police use of his cell phone data to track his location in real time was a search for which police, in this case, did not have probable cause, since they had only received a court order to obtain the telephone numbers of his calls.

As this case and others show, violations of privacy can and do happen in the course of criminal investigations. It is important for criminal suspects to be aware of their privacy rights and the protections available to them. For instance, one protection available to defendants subjected to an illegal search is to have illegally obtained evidence excluded from trial. Defendants who are able to make use of this protection can end up weakening prosecutors’ case by removing key evidence from being exhibited at trial.

In a future post, we’ll take a bit more look at the exclusionary rule and how it works.

Source: The Washington Times, “Florida rules police can’t track cellphones without warrant,” Cheryl K. Chumley, October 17, 2014. 

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Mark J. O'Brien's cases have been featured in:
The New York Times | The Miami Herald | Bay News 9 | abc 7 | The Boston Globe | USA Today | Tampa Bay Times | FOX News Channel | The Washington Post | abc Good Morning America | Chicago Tribune | NT News Talk Florida | St. Petersburg Times | Deadspin
“Mark, thank you for everything. I will forever be indebted to you. You have stood by me and believed in me when it was not the popular thing to do. You are an amazing advocate.” Adam Filthaut
  • Former Partner at the Law Firm of Adams and Diaco (Robert Adams and Stephen Diaco)
  • MJ (Todd Schnitt) Morning Show/Bubba the Love Sponge Clem Trial
  • Attorney Phil Campbell DUI Setup/Florida Bar Trial
More Testimonials
American Association for Justice National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers | NACDL 1958 Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers | FACDL Super Lawyers AVVO | See Reviews LC | Lead Counsel Rated
Best Criminal
Defense Lawyers
in Orlando