PLEASE NOTE: To protect your safety in response to the threats of Covid-19, we are offering our clients the ability to meet with us in-person, via telephone, or through video conferencing. Please call our office to discuss your options.

Tampa 813-345-4909 | En Español 813-390-2494
Orlando / Miami / West Palm Beach - 888-496-5916

Witness Identifications: Often Incorrect?

When an eye-witness identifies a suspect to law enforcement, it rarely occurs from a line up of people through a large glass window, as commonly seen on television shows like "Law and Order." Witnesses will often identify a person from an assortment of six photographs, called a photopack. Often times, law enforcement will use a procedure in which a person's photograph will look different from all of the other photographs in the photopack.

In other words, the person suspected of committing the crime will look different than the other five people in the photopack. In other cases, law enforcement will ask a witness to make an identification from only one photograph. There are even circumstances in which a witness is shown only one person in handcuffs in person.

When there is only one photograph, or when a certain photograph is different from the others, the identification procedure may not be reliable because it suggests whom the witness should choose. In these cases, a criminal defense attorney should file a pre-trial motion to have the suggestive identification excluded from the defendant's trial.

Courts determine whether to exclude the identification by using a two-pronged approach: (1) whether the police used an unnecessarily suggestive procedure and (2) if so, considering all the circumstances, whether the suggestive procedure gave rise to a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification. See State v. Dorsey, 5 So. 3d 702, 705 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). If successful, a pre-trial motion to exclude the identification can greatly affect the outcome of the Defendant's case. If unsuccessful, the issue will be preserved for appellate review. A zealous defense attorney will keep fighting a suggestive identification issue at each stage of a client's criminal case.

When a defendant's charges are based solely based on an identification, it is imperative that the defense attorney assess the suggestive nature of the identification. At the end of the day, a person who is identified as a criminal suspect may be nothing more than the person suggested as the suspect.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Mark J. O'Brien's cases have been featured in:
The New York Times | The Miami Herald | Bay News 9 | abc 7 | The Boston Globe | USA Today | Tampa Bay Times | FOX News Channel | The Washington Post | abc Good Morning America | Chicago Tribune | NT News Talk Florida | St. Petersburg Times | Deadspin
“Mark, thank you for everything. I will forever be indebted to you. You have stood by me and believed in me when it was not the popular thing to do. You are an amazing advocate.” Adam Filthaut
  • Former Partner at the Law Firm of Adams and Diaco (Robert Adams and Stephen Diaco)
  • MJ (Todd Schnitt) Morning Show/Bubba the Love Sponge Clem Trial
  • Attorney Phil Campbell DUI Setup/Florida Bar Trial
More Testimonials
American Association for Justice National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers | NACDL 1958 Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers | FACDL Super Lawyers AVVO | See Reviews LC | Lead Counsel Rated
Best Criminal
Defense Lawyers
in Orlando