PLEASE NOTE: To protect your safety in response to the threats of Covid-19, we are offering our clients the ability to meet with us in-person, via telephone, or through video conferencing. Please call our office to discuss your options.

FEDERAL AND STATE CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS
O'Brien Hatfield, PA GET YOUR FREE CASE REVIEW GET YOUR FREE CASE REVIEW Text Us Now
Tampa 813-345-4909 | En EspaƱol 813-390-2494
Orlando / Miami / West Palm Beach - 888-496-5916

Felon in Possession Convictions Violate Double Jeopardy

In Bell v. State, 38 Fla. L. Weekly D2105b (Fla. 2nd DCA 2013), Bell sought review of his convictions and sentences for felon in possession of a firearm and felon in possession of ammunition. Bell contended that the dual convictions violated double jeopardy.

The Second District Court of Appeal agreed and found that both convictions could not stand. The applicable statute prohibited Bell's possession of any firearm, ammunition, or electric weapon or device. The statute did not define "any." The Court stated that the word "any" is generally defined as "one, some, every, or all without specification." The Court found that by definition, the word "any" was linguistically ambiguous.

The Second District Court of Appeal recognized that it was required to construe the statute in the manner most favorable to Bell, and stated that doing so prohibited his dual convictions. The Court reversed the Defendant's dual convictions and remanded to the lower court for it to vacate one of the convictions and to resentence Bell.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Mark J. O'Brien's cases have been featured in:
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive] More Testimonials
[an error occurred while processing this directive]