Federal Crimes Sentencing Guidelines Career Offender Status

Regarding the federal crimes sentencing guidelines career offender designation, the Eleventh Circuit holds that a youthful offender eighteen years or older who pleads guilty and is adjudicated is considered to have sustained a conviction for purposes of the Guidelines career offender enhancement, even if state law does not consider him "convicted."

In 2002, when Elliot was 20 years old, he robbed a man in Alabama of $150 and a pack of cigarettes while armed with a pistol. Elliot was charged with first-degree robbery and received a youthful offender adjudication (the Alabama Youthful Offender Act applies to anyone who is under 21 years of age), which resulted in a sentence of three years' probation. Elliot was subsequently convicted of second-degree robbery and his probation was revoked. Elliot asserted on appeal that his youthful offender adjudication does not qualify as a conviction for purposes of § 4B1.1 because, under the Alabama youthful offender statute, a defendant is determined to be a youthful offender before there is an arraignment or conviction. Furthermore, he argued, Alabama law prohibits a youthful offender adjudication from counting as a conviction.

The Eleventh Circuit rejected this argument. It noted that the career offender guideline explicitly provides that "a conviction for an offense committed at age eighteen or older is an adult conviction." The Court stated therefore that the question before it was not whether Elliot sustained an adult conviction, but whether he sustained a conviction at all.

The Court then noted that the meaning of "conviction" for purposes of the sentencing enhancement at issue in this case was a matter of federal crime law rather than state crime law. It was not, therefore, bound by the fact that Alabama law does not consider a youthful offender adjudication to be a conviction.

Instead, the Court wrote, its decision was controlled by United States v. Acosta, 287 F.3d 1034, 1037 (11th Cir. 2002) and analogous cases in which the Court had held that a plea of nolo contendere with adjudication withheld is a conviction for purposes of the § 4B1.1 career offender enhancement. If, the Court concluded, a defendant who is not adjudicated guilty is considered to have suffered a conviction within the meaning of § 4B1.1, then a youthful offender who pled guilty and was adjudicated must also be considered to have sustained a conviction for purposes of the Guidelines career offender enhancement, even if state law does not consider him "convicted."

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • Badge 1
  • Badge 2
  • Badge 3
  • Badge 4
  • Badge 5
  • Badge 6
  • Badge 7
  • Badge 8

Contact O'Brien Hatfield, PA for a free case evaluation today

In Tampa, call (813) 345-4909. In Orlando, call (888) 496-5916 . For fast answers, email us using the form below.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

This site uses Google's Invisible reCAPTCHA, which is subject to Google's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Footer Brand

Tampa Bay Office
511 West Bay Street Suite 330
Tampa, FL 33606

Toll Free: 888-496-5916
Phone: 813-345-4909
Tampa Law Office Map

Central Florida Office
121 South Orange Avenue Suite 1500
Orlando, FL 32801

Toll Free: 888-496-5916
Phone: 407-686-1696
Orlando Law Office Map

South Florida Office
Northbridge Tower
515 North Flagler Drive
Suite P-300
West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Toll Free: 888-496-5916
Phone: 407-686-1696
South Florida Office Map

South Florida Office
Brickell Bay Office Tower
1001 Brickell Bay Drive
Suite 2700 M-1
Miami, FL 33131

Toll Free: 888-496-5916
Phone: 305-859-0046
Miami Law Office Map