Tampa Federal Criminal Defense Lawyer

  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Case Results
  4.  » Notable Federal Supervised Release Case Results

Notable Federal Supervised Release Case Results

USA v. COBB CASE NO.: 8:07-CR-00401-JSM-TGW
Counts: Violation of Federal Supervised Release
District Judge: Moody
Sentencing Guidelines: 18 to 24 months in federal prison
Case Result: Credit for time already served.
*This sentence variance was the result of a 3553(a) mitigation analysis. The Defendant did not receive a government 5K substantial assistance sentencing reduction.

USA v. WILLIS CASE NO.: 5:03-CR-WTH-TBS
Counts: Violation of Federal Supervised Release
District Judge: Hodges
Sentencing Guidelines: 36 months in federal prison
Case Result: Case Dismissed.
*All supervised release violations were dismissed after trial counsel proved the victim lied about being threatened by Mr. Willis with an AK-47 in the underlying state case.

USA v. FIELDS CASE NO.: 8:08-CR-227-JSM-EAJ
Counts: Violation of Federal Supervised Release
District Judge: Moody
Sentencing Guidelines: 6 to 12 months in federal prison
Case Result: Dismissal of all supervised release allegations after a full hearing.
*This sentence variance was the result of a 3553(a) mitigation analysis. The Defendant did not receive a government 5K substantial assistance sentencing reduction.

USA v. SUTTER CASE NO.: 8:04-CR-542-SCB-MAP
Counts: Violation of Federal Supervised Release
District Judge: Bucklew
Sentencing Guidelines: 6 to 12 months in federal prison
Case Result: Reinstatement to original term of supervised release after a full hearing.
*This sentence variance was the result of a 3553(a) mitigation analysis. The Defendant did not receive a government 5K substantial assistance sentencing reduction.

USA v. CLYBURN CASE NO.: 8:95-CR-82-RAL-AEP
Counts: Violation of Federal Supervised Release
District Judge: Lazzara
Sentencing Guidelines: 46 to 57 months in federal prison
Case Result: Credit for time already served.
*This sentence variance was the result of a 3553(a) mitigation analysis. The Defendant did not receive a government 5K substantial assistance sentencing reduction.