Federal Fraud Results

USA v. DOE No Case Number Assigned RN-2013 (Tampa)
Counts: Conspiracy to Commit Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud
Case Result: No arrest. No indictment.

USA v. DOE No Case Number Assigned NN-2013 (Tampa)
Counts: Conspiracy to Commit Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud
Case Result: No arrest. No indictment.

USA v. DOE No Case Number Assigned JA-2013 (Tampa)
Counts: Conspiracy to Commit Mortgage Fraud, Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud
Case Result: No arrest. No indictment.

USA v. DOE No Case Number Assigned CB-2012 (Tampa)
Counts: Conspiracy to Commit Mortgage, Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud
Case Result: No arrest. No indictment.

USA v. DOE No Case Number Assigned CB-2012 (Tampa)
Counts: Conspiracy to Commit Mortgage, Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud
Case Result: No arrest. No indictment.

USA v. DOE No Case Number Assigned WB-2014 (Tampa)
Counts: Conspiracy to Commit IRS, Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud
Case Result: No arrest. No indictment.

USA v. F. WILLIAMS CASE NO.: 8:13-CR-428-RAL-AEP (Tampa)
Counts: Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud and Mail Fraud
District Judge: Lazarra
Sentencing Guidelines: 21 to 27 months in federal prison
Case Result: A below guideline sentence of federal probation.
*This sentence variance was in part the result of a 3553(a) mitigation analysis.

USA v. SORCHEVICH CASE NO.: 8:12-CR-51-RAL-EAJ (Tampa)
Counts: Mortgage Fraud - Approximately $1,000,000
District Judge: Lazzara
Sentencing Guidelines 16 to 21 months in federal prison
Case Result: A below guideline sentence of federal probation.
*This sentence variance was in part the result of a 3553(a) mitigation analysis.

USA v. HAMID CASE NO.: 8:11-CR-289-RAL-EAJ (Tampa)
Counts: Conspiracy of a Business Owner to Traffic in Stolen Merchandise
District Judge: Lazarra
Sentencing Guidelines: 6 to 12 months in federal prison
Case Result: A below guideline sentence of federal probation.
*This sentence variance was in part the result of a 3553(a) mitigation analysis.

USA v. FARINHA CASE NO.: 8:09-CR-464-RAL-AEP (Tampa)
Counts: Mortgage Fraud - Approximately $500,000
District Judge: Lazzara
Sentencing Guidelines 12 to 18 months in federal prison
Case Result: A below guideline sentence of federal probation.
*This sentence variance was the result of a 3553(a) mitigation analysis.

USA v. LOUISSAINT CASE NO.: 8:10-CR-416-VMC-TGW (Tampa)
Counts: Conspiracy to Commit Tax Fraud - Approximately $300,000
District Judge: Covington
Sentencing Guidelines 12 to 18 months in federal prison
Case Result: A below guideline sentence of federal probation.
*This sentence variance was in part the result of a 3553(a) mitigation analysis.

USA v. MEJIA CASE NO.: 8:06-CR- 400-JDW-EAJ (Tampa)
Counts: Money Laundering
District Judge: Whittemore
Sentencing Guidelines: 78 to 97 months in federal prison
Case Result: A below guideline sentence of federal probation.
*This sentence variance was in part the result of a 3553(a) mitigation analysis.

USA v. NASSER CASE NO.: 8:12-CR-403-T- (Tampa)
Counts: Wire Fraud - Approximately $360,000
Senior District Judge: Castagna
Sentencing Guidelines 30 to 37 months in federal prison
Case Result: A below guideline sentence of federal probation.
*This sentence variance was the result of sustained legal objections.

USA v. GRANT CASE NO.: 8:05-CR-458-JDW-TGW (Tampa)
Counts: Wire Fraud - Approximately $5,000,000
District Judge: Whittemore
Sentencing Guidelines: Approximately 240 months in federal prison
Case Result: A below guideline sentence of 18 months and a dismissal of 15 of the 16 counts.
*This sentence variance was the result of a 3553(a) mitigation analysis.

USA v. GUDELIS CASE NO.: 3:12-CR-23-LC (Pensacola)
Counts: Mortgage Fraud - Approximately $7,000,000 Sentencing Guidelines: 78 to 97 months in federal prison Case Result: A below guideline sentence of 24 months.

*This sentence variance was in part the result of a 3553(a) mitigation analysis.